Keystone XL pipeline opponents want details on Trump’s approval of project

Keystone XL pipeline opponents want details on Trump’s approval of project
In this Feb. 12, 2018, photo, U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with state and local officials about infrastructure in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington.


Environmentalists who sued to stop the 1,800-kilometre pipeline said the documents could bolster their case that Trump’s decision was arbitrary and should be overturned by the courts.

But U.S. Justice Department attorneys argued in court filings that the disputed documents include internal deliberations that don’t have to be made public. They said the request amounts to a “fishing expedition” and should be rejected.

Formal arguments were scheduled for Wednesday before U.S. District Judge Brian Morris in Great Falls.

If the environmentalists prevail, the U.S. State Department would have to review an estimated five million pages of documents at a cost of more than $6 million, according to a declaration filed by Jerry Drake, an agency division chief who oversees its information technology team.

That’s on top of more than 4.5 million documents that were turned over in the case in December, according to the Justice Department.

President Barack Obama’s administration rejected the pipeline in 2015 after it had become a flashpoint in the debate over climate change and fossil fuel use. It was revived in March 2017 under Trump, who insisted it would lead to greater energy independence.

The pipeline is sponsored by Alberta-based company TransCanada Corp., which is siding with the U.S. government in the document dispute.

An attorney for the Northern Plains Resource Council, one of the plaintiffs in the case, said the goal of the conservation group’s sweeping document request was to uncover the basis of Trump’s decision and see if it aligns with years of analysis on the project during the Obama years.

“You can’t make one decision based upon the record, then change your mind based upon the same record,” council attorney Timothy Bechtold said. “That is the definition of arbitrary and capricious.”

The judge has sided with the plaintiffs once, rejecting a bid by the Trump administration in November to dismiss the lawsuits over Keystone. The administration unsuccessfully argued the courts have no authority in the matter because it concerns foreign affairs and national security.

TransCanada announced last month that it hopes to begin construction in 2019 after securing enough commitments from oil companies to ship approximately 500,000 barrels per day through the line.

If completed, the pipeline would carry oil from Alberta through Montana, South Dakota and Nebraska, where it would connect to an existing pump station in Steele City, Neb. From there, it would continue through Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas until it reaches Gulf Coast refineries.
News Topics :
Months after the Keystone XL pipeline through the U.S. was approved by the Trump administration, an American court put everything on hold. Vinesh Pratap has more on the implications in...
LOUISVILLE, Ky. — The top Republican in the U.S. Senate says he asked president elect Donald Trump to move swiftly in approving construction of the Keystone XL pipeline that would allow...
WATCH ABOVE TransCanada says it has received a presidential permit from the U.S. State Department that allows it to build the long delayed Keystone XL pipeline. Listen TransCanada says it...
U.S. President Donald Trump in the Oval Office before signing an executive order on the Keystone XL pipeline, on Jan. 24, 2017. Evan Vucci / AP Published Tuesday, October 10,...
Top Stories
Crews work on construction of the TransCanada Keystone XL Pipeline near County Road 363 and County Road 357, east of Winona, Texas, Monday, Dec. 3, 2012. The Tyler Morning Telegraph,...