News

Yedlin: Pipeline summit proves a positive step

Yedlin: Pipeline summit proves a positive step
Business
If you were grading the performances of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Premier Rachel Notley and B.C. Premier John Horgan following Sunday’s pipeline summit in Ottawa, there’s no question Horgan came away with the lowest mark. 

Not quite an F, but close.

Horgan was emphatic that British Columbia can — and will — challenge the federal government’s constitutional authority on Trans Mountain by proceeding with the reference case regarding jurisdiction.

It didn’t take long for Trudeau to throw cold water on that pronouncement, saying Ottawa is pursuing legislative options that will assert and reinforce the government’s jurisdiction over the project so it can be built.

“The first thing that strikes you when you talk to people in Fort Mac, is that they are from everywhere. Every province and territory,” the prime minister told reporters. “The work these Canadians do together creates jobs and feeds families everywhere. It is with them in mind that we assert the government’s constitutional authority to complete this project.”

Discussions have also started between Kinder Morgan, the federal government and Alberta regarding a financial interest in the project that would help decrease the risk and facilitate the start of construction.

The key will be what the structure of that financial support looks like. But the fact those involved are from Alberta, Toronto, New York and Houston is a clear signal that intelligent financial and legal minds are working on the transaction.  

It will happen. Just as it did in the cases of Hibernia, Syncrude and Muskrat Falls, where the government put dollars or loan guarantees behind projects deemed important but needing government support to clear critical hurdles.

There was no missing Trudeau’s frustration with Horgan on Sunday afternoon.

Were it not for “the actions and rhetoric” of the B.C. government, Canada would not be in this position, he said.

Notley did not mince words, either.

“I think for the most part, what we have been seeing from the government of B.C. has been a very considered attempt to create uncertainty by coming up with creative areas in which to insert a certain amount of legal debate,” she said.

“We don’t believe it is in the best interests of the country to engage in esoteric jurisdictional debates for the purposes of harassing a project to death, which in effect, I think has been happening to this point.”

The premier, like Trudeau, did not appear concerned about the case for jurisdiction.

“The federal government is very confident in the legal case and we are very confident in the legal case,” she said.

Beyond that, there is the issue of investor confidence and the need to respect the decisions made by companies for investment purposes under past governments.
Read more on calgaryherald.com
News Topics :
Similar Articles :
Canada
VICTORIA—British Columbia’s attorney general says Alberta’s proposed fuel restriction law is a politically motivated “bluff” that will result in an immediate lawsuit from his province and likely lawsuits from oil...
Top Stories
It is the only way to interpret Thursday s news that the government is backpedalling on its earlier pronouncement it would regulate the flow of any additional bitumen going through...
Business
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau fields questions after the Liberal cabinet meeting in St. John s, N.L. on Wednesday, Sept. 13, 2017. Listen Faced with an escalating battle between British Columbia...
Canada
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, seen during a press conference last week, has set the stage for federal intervention to push ahead with the construction of the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion.   LARS...
Canada
VICTORIA—The Alberta government accepted an olive branch from British Columbia and suspended its ban on the province’s wine Thursday in a dispute over the Trans Mountain pipeline. Alberta Premier Rachel...