Keep players safe but call fewer penalties: CFL rules committee faces tall task ahead of new season

Keep players safe but call fewer penalties: CFL rules committee faces tall task ahead of new season
Not likely, but the league is trending in the right direction in all areas, and vice-president of officiating Glen Johnson believes the rules committee can come up with more innovative ways to keep it going.

Its very much about game flow, its very much about fan experience, Johnson said before Mondays first rules committee session.

Were trying to balance all of those things, while still protecting the integrity of the game. We dont want to make the game completely different, but we understand that the flow and how things are experienced both in stadium and on broadcast are so important.

Heres a look as the some of the topics that will be discussed before the committee takes a vote on recommendations for changes on Wednesday:

The CFL reduced the number of flags thrown by its officials by 13 per cent last year, which is a significant improvement, but its still not good enough.

Reducing penalties is something weve been working on for a number of years now and we continue to realize that there are still too many penalties in the game, Johnson said. Its a shared responsibility between coaches and players and officials, and we keep working hard to try to figure out ways to get that number down.

Committee membersalso will try to identify penalties they can remove from the rule book.

We took out a certain kind of penalty last year that reduced the number of penalties by about 100, Johnson said. It was a procedure movement by the offensive linemen. We allowed them to be a little more fluid and only stationary just prior to the snap.

Another idea is changing the standard by which certain calls like illegal blocks on kick returns are made.

Possibly were going to make a certain type of play more lenient on the standard, Johnson said. We dont want fans saying every time theres a big play, Oh my goodness, is there going to be a penalty? We want to get to a spot where you are enjoying that excitement and only on those rare occasions will there be a penalty.

The league was forced to make a rule change in mid-season last year because too many coaches challenge flags were being thrown. They made the decision to throw a challenge flag more punitive for coaches by putting a timeout at risk for every challenge, whereas in the past, coachesonly put a timeout at risk with their second challenge.

Until the change was made, coaches challenges had risen to 2.2 per game from 1.26; the new timeout rule helped bring that number back down to 1.6 per game. Of course, last year at this time the rules committee added seven new penalties that coaches could challenge, which certainly contributed to the rise in flags.

We feel were still not in a spot thats good enough, Johnson said. Were looking at, Should we challenge (fewer)things? Some of those penalties, should we take them out? Were also looking at changing the process itself, so potentially, how many challenges coaches get or the actual process we use to do it. If we can make it faster, does that make more sense? Have the number be the same but have the whole thing just take a shorter period of time.

The committee also will look at the way the league uses its video official, who works out of the command centre in Toronto and is connected by headset to the officials on the field.

Introduced last season, the eye-in-the-sky helped with administrative aspects of the game, like correcting spots, adjusting game clocks and, on rare occasions, telling on-field officials to pick up flags. That happened only 10 times all season.

The rules committee is looking at more ways for the video official to become involved and get things right, without affecting the flow of the game.

Fix something that is obviously wrong, fix it in a hurry, Johnson said. Lets do the right thing and just keep moving.

The rules committee could recommend allowing the video official to call penalties, but only in a situation where the play is already stopped by another flag.

We dont want to start officiating the game from the command centre, Johnson said. But once a flag is already down, and weve already stopped the game, theres some administration thats going to happen and we want them to just think about getting the situation right.

Topics: CFL , Sports , CFL Week 2017 , Glen Johnson

In March, it s easy to relax with games on TV all day: Men can say, "Doctor s orders, I have to take it easy and sit on the couch"

Once again, all eyes are on Jack Hughes. That includes the many scouts from the Ontario Hockey League and the U.S. National Development Team Program

From Reg Noble to Bill Barilko to Bobby Baun to Mats Sundin, delve into the franchise s 100-year history with our interactive tracker

From one perspective, they cant get any worse, the Junior B league president said of the Surrey Knights. You cant go any worse than 0-44
Read more on National Post
News Topics :
Similar Articles :
Johnson, the CFL s vice president of officiating, is convinced that the league has done the right thing by allowing coaches to challenge called and non called defensive pass interference rulings by...
Players aren t the only people on the field who will be held to a higher standard this season, as the CFL s new vice president of officiating says the men...
TORONTO Pass interference should be subject to video review during the upcoming CFL season, the league s rules committee announced Thursday. A proposal approved by the committee says coaches...
The Canadian Football League has approved a rule change on coaches challenges. Effective immediately, if a team makes their first coach’s challenge of the game and does not win that...
There he was, a Canadian from Burlington, Ont., and a head referee in the CFL, working as a field judge in an NFL exhibition game as part of an officials...