Diablo 4 impressions: Soaking in dark atmosphere and feel-good combat - Ars Technica
|Ars Technica 09 Nov 2019 at 10:29|
While there was some tension in the media coverage and social conversation around this BlizzCon after the company s decision to temporarily suspend a proHearthstoneplayer for making a political statement during an official stream, it was not the dominant mood on the ground. From the keynote through the community events, it was clear most people were a lot more concerned about the games than anything else.
So I went to BlizzCon 2019 as a fan with deep, deep history in these games. And these are my (largely positive) impressions of arguably the biggest new game at the show:Diablo 4.
Let s get this out of the way first:despite modern game design concepts and very modern rendering tech,Diablo 4 looks a lot more likeDiablo 2 than it doesDiablo 3. It s not cartoon-ish or colorful; it s dark, grim, muted, and painterly. If you re in the cadre of players who were disappointed byDiablo 3 s lighter, campier tone, you ll be pleased to see a return to form here.
Every asset in the area I played was created to convey a sense of decay, despair, and violence. And Blizzard has implemented cinematic transitions between areas. Instead of simply clicking on a dungeon entrance and teleporting to a starting point for that dungeon as in previous titles, your character will do something like get on their hands and knees to push vines aside and crawl through a cramped crawlspace, emerging on the other side. The game goes into aTomb Raider-like cinematic camera view to depict these transitions, then it returns to the standard top-down view once the transition is complete.
There are a lot of bells and whistles like that intended to give the game a bit more gravity and counter the cartoony floaty-ness (for lack of a better term) of Diablo 3.We interviewed two members of the art team at the show, and they enthusiastically listed the major graphical improvements and engine features they ve introduced this time around. For one thing,Diablo 4 employs physically-based rendering. It also has environments with slopes and hills in a way that evenDiablo 3 didn t, and player characters seamlessly transition between animations in more realistic ways. (Prior iterations simply canceled the current animation when starting a new one, butDiablo 4 follows a model represented by a lot of more modern triple-A games).
It all looks great, but as is usually the case with Blizzard titles, it s the art that really sells the experience. The technical stuff is in a supporting role.
The look ofDiablo 4 was what struck me most about it, but it s also the hardest thing to convey in writingso you ll just have to go off of screenshots, concept art, and videos.
There s no question that it feels a bit likeDiablo 3 to play. Class skills have a similar cadence, similar effects, and fall into similar categories to those in3; which is a good thing, becauseDiablo 3 feels great to play.
I played as a Druida class that shapeshifts at will. The left mouse button attacked in one form (a werewolf of sorts), the right mouse button in the other (a bear). In addition to that, there was an action bar of other abilitiesstandard Diablo stuff. LikeDiablo 3, many abilities involve very clear movement like leaps or charges; it even brings the dodge mechanic over to the PC from the console version ofDiablo 3.
It s tight and fast to play, but fundamentally, if you ve played any other Diablo-like action RPG, you ve played this one to some degree. It s worth noting that there are public events and that it phases players in around you at relevant moments similar toDestiny and its ilk. I fought one large world boss and participated in one random eventboth were very similar to what you d see in modern MMOs.
While the demo was too short for me to really sink my teeth into progression systems, I was able to confirm that it s something of a hybrid ofDiablo 3 and earlier titles. One panel has you picking between options for each ability slot, much likeDiablo 3, but the other is a more oldschool talent tree with each point giving marginal advantages like +X% to the crit rating of some ability, or what have you. It seems like it should appeal to oldschool and newschool fans alike.
That said, it s very clear that this is anearly demo. Reports indicated that Blizzard rebooted its work onDiablo 4 back in 2016, and knowing the way the company normally works, having a playable demo only three years into this iteration is quite surprising. You d be forgiven for suspecting Blizzard rushed to this point to alleviate fan anxiety over the lack of an announcement last year. Because it s clearly a demo pushed out for having-a-demo s sake, we can t be sure much of anything we saw here will stick all the way to launch two or more years from now.
But, what s here now is already fantastica perfect blend ofDiablo 2 andDiablo 3 with modern nu-MMO (Destiny,The Division,Path of Exile) sensibilities.
WhenDiablo 3 first launched, I played the campaign but stopped there. It just didn t grab me; the itemization seemed all out of whack, and the idea of repeating story chapters to grind for legendaries didn t appeal to me. However, all that changed with the launch of Reaper of Souls, and later, the console version. I began playing Diablo 3 with my wife (then girlfriend) in co-op splitscreen (which Blizzard confirmed to be will also be a feature in the console versions of Diablo 4)for hours a week, and the redesigned endgame (including Adventure Mode, Greater Rifts, and all that good stuff) had us seriously hooked.
Between the two of us, we ended up building every class to max level, reaching embarrassingly high Greater Rift levels, and securing every set for every class. Ultimately, I playedDiablo 3 more than I ever playedDiablo 2. It became one of my favorite games of all time. But I didn t love everything about it.
For one, the game didn t have the same sense of atmosphere thatDiablo 2 did. For another, I felt the over-reliance on set-based builds made the endgame a little bland. Sure, seasons could mix it up a bit, but it really meant there was a relatively limited set of viable builds, as there were usually one or two set builds per class that were way better than the others for running rifts, and the majority of your equipment slots were unmovable since it was all about sets.
So doesDiablo 4 address both of those concerns? It seems like the answer to both is tentatively "yes."
While my demo time wasn t long enough to give me a real sense of what min-maxing in the endgame would be like, Blizzard designers said duringDiablo 4 s BlizzCon panels that this game will de-emphasize sets in favor of legendaries to some degree. They also mentioned that there will be a ton of legendaries, but at a somewhat lower drop rate than modernDiablo 3. That said, legendary drop rates were too low atDiablo 3 s launch, but the game ended up being a legendary piata with too-high drop rates later in its life. So it stands to reason thatDiablo 4 will evolve too.
As for atmosphere, as noted above, the game has that in spadesin fact, in this very early build, that right there is my main takeaway. It s dripping, oozing, soaking with weary, hazy, gothic, horrific atmosphere. In that respect, it borrows a great deal more fromDiablo 2 than it does fromDiablo 3. And while I enjoyedDiablo 3 more than some series die-hards, on that point I believeDiablo 2 has more to offer, so this is a welcome development.
Listing image by Blizzard
5 with 5 posters participating
Samuel Axon Based in Los Angeles, Samuel is the Senior Reviews Editor at Ars Technica, where he covers Apple products, displays, hardware and software for developers and creative professionals, and more. He is a reformed media executive who has been writing about technology for 10 years at Ars Technica, Engadget, Mashable, PC World, and many others. He is also a hobbyist iOS and indie game developer.