News

Ride-Hailing Services Aimed at Cutting Traffic Are Having the Opposite Effect

Ride-Hailing Services Aimed at Cutting Traffic Are Having the Opposite Effect
Technology
Ride-sharing services like Uber and Lyft are making our city streets more congested. Passengers who once relied on public transport are now going for the cab.

Ride-hailing services like Uber and Lyft were supposed to make our streets less congested, but studies suggest that they’re having the opposite effect.

A in October 2017, which surveyed over 4,000 adults in seven U.S. cities, found that after rolling out one of the two services public transport usage dropped by six percent. More worryingly, the study found that between 49 and 61 percent of journeys made using the likes of Uber and Lyft would have been made on foot, on a bike, on public transport, or not made at all, if those services weren’t available.

This observation was echoed by a new study carried out by the Metropolitan Area Planning Council , which surveyed 944 ride-hailing passengers in the Boston metro area. Here, 12 percent said that if ride-hailing services weren’t available, they would have walked or cycled, and 42 percent said they would have used public transport.

This stands in stark contrast to comments made by Uber co-founder Travis Kalanick in 2015, when he said “we envision a world where there’s no more traffic in Boston in five years.”  According to a , he reiterated his point saying that if every car in the city was an Uber, the road network would be way more efficient. The company’s big plan for the future revolves around a self-driving fleet , which they claim could potentially prevent traffic jams .

If once there were hopes that ride-hailing services would work alongside public transport, they seem to have been quashed. “Ride sharing is pulling from and not complementing public transportation,” said Alison Felix, an author of the MAPC report, in .

But this development doesn’t come as a surprise, not for everyone. Over a year ago, in an article for The Guardian , a senior fellow at the New Cities Foundation Greg Lindsay wrote that Uber was looking to “disrupt the bus.”  If ride-hailing services are going to continue to play a major role in our travel plans, public transport might pay the price.
Read more on futurism.com
News Topics :
Similar Articles :
Business
BOSTON—One promise of ride hailing companies such as Uber and Lyft was fewer cars clogging city streets. But studies suggest the opposite that ride hailing companies are pulling riders off buses, subways,...
Business
BOSTON One promise of ride hailing companies like Uber and Lyft was fewer cars clogging city streets. But studies suggest the opposite that ride hailing companies are pulling riders off buses,...
Technology
Uber and Lyft have made getting places easier than ever, but their convenience appears to be having an unintended side effect on cities more traffic. Matter of debate Uber says...
Technology
Say hello to CIMON That’s “crew interactive mobile companion, ” if you aren’t on first name terms. Built by Airbus , it’s mneant to float around the International Space Station, where it will...
Technology
Traffic in New York is slowing down. Jams are endemic in Manhattan, especially in its business districts. Daytime traffic in the busiest areas now moves almost 20 more slowly than...