U.S. greenhouse gas emissions spiked in 2018 â and it couldnât happen at a worse time
|National Post 08 Jan 2019 at 05:39|
U.S. carbon dioxide emissions rose an estimated 3.4 per cent in 2018, according to new research â a jarring increase that comes as scientists say the world needs to be aggressively cutting its emissions to avoid the most devastating effects of climate change.
The findings, published Tuesday by the independent economic research firm Rhodium Group, mean that the United States now has a diminishing chance of meeting its pledge under the 2015 Paris climate agreement to dramatically reduce its emissions by 2025.
The findings also underscore how the worldâs second-largest emitter, once a global leader in pushing for climate action, has all but abandoned efforts to mitigate the effects of a warming world. U.S. President Donald Trump has said he plans to officially withdraw the nation from the Paris climate agreement in 2020 and in the meantime has rolled back Obama-era regulations aimed at reducing the countryâs carbon emissions.
âWe have lost momentum. Thereâs no question,â Rob Jackson, a Stanford University professor who studies emissions trends, said of both U.S. and global efforts to steer the world toward a more sustainable future.
I don t think you would have seen the same increase
The sharp emissions rise was fueled primarily by a booming economy, researchers found. But the increase, which could prove to be the second-largest in the past 20 years, probably would not have been as stark without Trump administration rollbacks, said Trevor Houser, a partner at Rhodium.
âI donât think you would have seen the same increase,â Houser said, referring to the electric power sector in particular.
Emissions from electric power generation rose 1.9 per cent in 2018, the analysis found, driven chiefly by more demand for electricity, which was largely satisfied by more burning of natural gas. This fuel emits less greenhouse gas than coal when burned but is still a major contributor overall.
At the same time, emissions from the transportation sector rose 1 per cent thanks to more airline travel and greater on-road shipping. Industrial emissions from factories and other major facilities also rose significantly in 2018, the analysis found.
The figures, based on data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration and other sources, remain an estimate because some data from last year is not finalized. But the trend line is consistent with a recent estimate from a group of academics associated with the Global Carbon Project, which found U.S. emissions likely to rise 2.5 per cent in 2018.
Rising emissions are not just a U.S. problem. Global emissions also reached a record high in 2018, and the increase in the United States goes hand in hand with rising emissions in other countries, such as China and India, said Michael Mehling, deputy director of the Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
âItâs not an isolated phenomenon,â Mehling said, adding that the trend makes it difficult to solely blame the Trump administrationâs deregulatory push and its dismissal of climate action for the change. âSuch political developments, including the rollback of domestic climate policies in the U.S., tend to have a considerable lead time before you can actually see their reflection in physical emission trends.â
Former U.S. President Barack Obama address the participants at a summit on climate change involving mayors from around the globe Tuesday, Dec. 5, 2017, in Chicago. Charles Rex Arbogast/AP file photo
The latest growth makes it increasingly unlikely that the United States will achieve a pledge made by the Obama administration in the run-up to the Paris climate agreement, that the country would reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 26 to 28 per cent below 2005 levels by the year 2025.
A large part of President Barack Obamaâs plan for meeting that goal turned on key climate policies, including new regulations for vehicle fuel efficiency and power plants. These policies alone were not enough â the United States has never been on target to fulfill its Paris promises. But the Trump administration has moved to reverse or weaken them.
U.S. emissions have declined somewhat since 2005 because of technological changes, such as the dwindling of coal-fired power generation in the face of surging natural gas and the growth of renewable energy. In a major international climate change meeting in Poland last month, the Trump administration hailed a 14 per cent decline in emissions from 2005 levels.
But thatâs barely half of what the Obama administration was promising by 2025. And the 14 per cent figure has shrunk based on the latest findings. The result is that any chance of hitting the original Obama goal has diminished, said the Rhodium Groupâs Houser.
The latest emissions data comes as the worldâs scientists have called the global climate problem more urgent than previously thought â making the United Statesâ emissions trends and its path to withdraw from the Paris agreement more consequential.
In October, a United Nations-backed panel of nearly 100 scientists offered a detailed accounting of what it would take to limit planetary warming to just 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) â with the world already experiencing a 1 degree Celsius increase. They found not only that going beyond 1.5 degrees Celsius would have devastating impacts, but also that the world has only about a decade to make the âunprecedentedâ changes necessary to hold warming at this level.
At the Poland climate meeting, the United States joined three countries to oppose a proposal to embrace the study from the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. All were economies heavily reliant on fossil fuels â Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Russia.
Just as scientists have made clear the world needs to act with urgency, the United States has headed in the opposite direction. In 2020, even as many other countries have said they intend to ramp up their climate ambitions, the Trump administration is expected to be poised to complete its planned withdrawal from the Paris agreement.
In the United States, âitâs very unlikely that anything will happen with setting new targets or moving on climate by 2020,â said Johan RockstrĂ¶m, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany. âWhich is a big risk, given that we have to bend the curve by 2020.â
Such political developments, including the rollback of domestic climate policies in the U.S., tend to have a considerable lead time before you can actually see their reflection in physical emission trends
In Poland, countries decided to acknowledge the reportâs âtimely completionâ but removed a prior reference to its most inconvenient finding â that a world responsible for more than 50 billion tons of total carbon dioxide equivalent emissions in 2018 must make a monumental shift in the course of the coming decade.
âWhat youâve got is the United States on the top of a pyramid of fragmentation and creating space to legitimize that type of behaviour on the part of other countries,â said David Wirth, a former climate negotiator who is now a law professor at Boston College.
The key issue now is how all of this plays out over the next two years, leading up to 2020. That is both the year when the United States can formally exit the Paris climate agreement and the year when member countries need to announce more-ambitious climate plans.
That leaves a world facing a make-or-break decade for emissions reductions still unsure of exactly what role the United States will play, if any.
âOther countries are going to be looking at the [2020 presidential] campaign,â Wirth said. âIf youâve got all presidential candidates with the exception of one running for election saying, âIâm prepared to commit to bigger reductions,â then that will resonate.â
I saw this crazy-yellow product, says chef Rob Gentile. And I looked at (my chefs) and said, âWhat the hell is this?â
With the arrival of Burtynsky as a high-profile advocate, the science campaign to define and identify the Anthropocene gets a fresh publicity boost
The notion that detox diets and cleanses can purge our bodies of pollutants, pesticides and other toxic sludge is scientifically absurd, experts say
About five million Britons now abstain from alcohol during January, as part of the annual campaign which was first organized in 2013