News

Susan Delacourt: If Harry and Meghan can move to Canada, why not Scotland?

Susan Delacourt: If Harry and Meghan can move to Canada, why not Scotland?
Top Stories
Less than a day after Harry and Meghan won approval to break away from their royal life in the U.K. on Monday, Scotland was summarily denied its chance to stretch its dreams of independence from mother England.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson quashed Scotland’s aspirations for a new referendum in a breezy, one-page note early on Tuesday.

“Another independence referendum would continue the political stagnation that Scotland has seen for the last decade, with Scottish schools, hospitals and jobs again left behind because of a campaign to separate the U.K.,” Johnson said in his note to Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon.

He said he’d “carefully considered” the idea over the past few weeks since Sturgeon formally asked, but ultimately decided that since Scotland voted in 2014 to stay in the United Kingdom, he was holding them to that decision.

It’s worth noting that the Queen didn’t apply the same logic to her own deliberations on family independence this week. She didn’t tell Harry and Meghan that they were stuck with the country where they were married in royal style less than two years ago.

Instead, in her own, one-page missive, the Queen declared: “Although we would have preferred them to remain full-time working members of the royal family, we respect and understand their wish to live a more independent life as a family while remaining a valued part of my family.”

Here’s where we are, then, in Britain’s several, concurrently running independence sagas over these past few years: referendums (Brexit, Scottish independence) last forever; centuries-old royal obligations, not so much.

The logic linking these contradictory decisions revolves around populism, which is proving to be a stronger force than rules, duties or obligations — in Britain, yes, but also in the United States, where Donald Trump’s impeachment drama is a daily tug-of-war between populism and the law.

Harry and Meghan’s decision to live part of their lives in Canada, as part-time royalty, follows that evolution in the monarchy. Refusing them independence would have cost the monarchy dearly in popular currency.

The situation in Scotland is not that clear, for either side of the independence question. What Johnson has effectively told Scotland this week is that his popular will — a majority government, elected in December — is more powerful than any simmering desires for independence in Scotland.

We’ll see about that. I grew up with a Glasgow-born dad, and learned early that it’s not a great idea to tell a Scot what they cannot do. There’s a whole wing in Scotland’s national museum devoted to what the Scots invented when thwarted by the odds against them. (Basically, Western civilization.) While it’s been a few years since I covered the last Scots referendum in 2014, I predict that Johnson telling them they can’t have another vote may galvanize the desire to have one.

Scotland, alas, can’t do what Meghan and Harry did — spend a Christmas holiday in Canada and then unilaterally announce plans to cut some ties to Britain.

But the Scottish nationalist forces will be trying to harness the same forces of populism in days and months ahead to cast Boris Johnson and the U.K. as the ancient, rules-bound institutions that need to change.

Meanwhile, where Canada stands in all of this leaving-staying turmoil in Britain is intriguing — beyond being Harry and Meghan’s new part-time home.

The breakaway royals haven’t publicly discussed why they like Canada so much, but some of it must surely be based on the privacy they were accorded when they spent their recent holiday here. As the Victoria Times-Colonist noted, when finally disclosing that the royals had been spending time there, many people in Victoria were aware that Harry and Meghan were in their midst, but chose not to make a big, public deal of it .

Get more politics in your inbox

Sign Up Now

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his government like to say (rightly) that Canada remains a country committed to law and the rules-based order. Not the centuries-old rules of the monarchy, perhaps, but clearly some rules of privacy.

So amid all the populism sweeping the globe, this could be our new brand. Canada — home to independent-minded people who value their privacy. It might even lure Scotland here, which wouldn’t be the worst thing in the world.
Read more on Toronto Star
News Topics :
RELATED STORIES :
Top Stories
LONDON — British Prime Minister Boris Johnson wrote to Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon on Tuesday refusing her request to be given the powers to hold another Scottish independence referendum....
World
Scotland s First Minister Nicola Sturgeon poses for a photograph with newly elected SNP MP s in front of the V&A Museum in Dundee, Scotland, Britain December 14, 2019. REUTERS/Russell...
World
LONDON Reuters Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s promise to take Britain out of the European Union next month could jeopardize a much older union the United Kingdom which binds together...
World
LONDON—A constitutional standoff between London and Edinburgh loomed on Thursday as Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon demanded a transfer of power that would allow Scotland a fresh chance to split...
World
Prime Minister Boris Johnson may be celebrating a stunning election victory, but another leader also scored an emphatic win — and it’s one that promises to set up a renewed...