Trump expected to make new shutdown offer to Democrats
|National Post 19 Jan 2019 at 11:11|
WASHINGTON â Seeking a way to end the shutdown standoff, President Donald Trump is expected to announce Saturday that in exchange for money for his long-promised border wall he is open to trading protections for young people brought to the country illegally as children. But it was not clear such an offer would budge Democrats, who have previously rejected such a deal.
Trumpâs plans were confirmed by three people familiar with his thinking who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss them by name. Vice-President Mike Pence, Trumpâs son-in-law Jared Kushner and acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney have been working ânon-stopâ on the proposal, according to one of the people.
The president is also expected to include extending protections for those with Temporary Protected Status after fleeing countries affected by natural disasters or violence. Trump, though, is known to change his mind and could still decide on another course. His refusal to sign spending bills that lack the $5.7 billion he wants to start constructing that wall prompted the shutdown.
Democrats, meanwhile, are making their own move, pledging hundreds of millions of dollars more for border security.
It was unclear whether the developments, following days of clashes between Trump and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, represent serious steps toward resolving the partisan fight or instead are simply political posturing as the partial government shutdown reached a record 29th day. Hundreds of thousands of federal workers have gone without paychecks, with many enduring financial hardship. Many public services are unavailable to Americans during the closure.
The White House has declined to provide details about what the president would announce mid-afternoon Saturday. Trump was not expected to declare a national emergency, which he has said was an option to circumvent Congress, according to two people familiar with the planning.
âI think itâll be an important statement,â Trump told reporters Saturday before travelling to an air base in Delaware to honour four Americans killed in a suicide bomb attack in Syria this week.
Whatever the White House proposes will be the first major overture by the president since Jan. 8, when he gave an Oval Office address trying to make the public case for the border wall. Democrats have said they will not negotiate until the government reopens, raising questions about how Trump might move the ball forward.
Pelosi has also previously said that funding for the wall and legal protections for those immigrants known as âDreamers,â a key Democratic goal, should not be linked, calling them âtwo different subjectsâ in December.
The shutdown was prompted by Trumpâs refusal to sign spending bills that lack the $5.7 billion he wants to start constructing that wall. âWe need the help and the backup of a wall,â the president said Saturday.
Democrats were now proposing $563 million to hire 75 more immigration judges, who currently face large backlogs processing cases, and $524 million to improve ports of entry in Calexico, California, and San Luis, Arizona, a Democratic House aide said Friday. The money would be added to spending bills, largely negotiated between the House and Senate, which the House plans to vote on next week.
In addition, Democrats were working toward adding money for more border security personnel and for sensors and other technology to a separate bill financing the Department of Homeland Security, but no funds for a wall or other physical barriers, the aide said.
It was possible Democrats would introduce that measure next week as the cornerstone of their border security alternative to Trumpâs wall, the aide said. Earlier Friday, Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard, D-Calif., who leads the House Appropriations Committeeâs homeland security subcommittee, said in an interview that some Democrats were asking leaders, âWhat is our plan?â
The aide spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasnât authorized to discuss the details publicly.
In a video posted on his Twitter feed late Friday, Trump said both sides should âtake the politics out of itâ and âget to workâ to âmake a deal.â But he also repeated his warnings, saying: âWe have to secure our southern border. If we donât do that, weâre a very, very sad and foolish lot.â
Few would argue that a humanitarian crisis is unfolding at the U.S.-Mexico border, as the demand for entry by migrants and the Trump administrationâs hard-line response overwhelm border resources. But critics say Trump has dramatically exaggerated the security risks and they argue that a wall would do little to solve existing problems.
Trumpâs Friday evening tweeted announcement came after Pelosi on Friday cancelled her plans to travel by commercial plane to visit U.S. troops in Afghanistan, saying Trump had caused a security risk by talking about the trip. The White House said there was no such leak.
It was the latest turn in the high-stakes brinkmanship between Trump and Pelosi that has played out against the stalled negotiations.
Pelosi had suggested Trump postpone the annual State of the Union address, a Washington tradition and a platform for his border wall fight with Democrats. It is tentatively scheduled for Jan. 29.
Trump never responded directly. Instead, he abruptly cancelled Pelosiâs military flight on Thursday, hours before she and a congressional delegation were to depart for Afghanistan on the previously undisclosed visit to U.S. troops. He asserted on Saturday that Pelosi is âunder total control of the radical left.â
A B.C. case raises difficult questions about parental rights and about how young is too young to make medical decisions. The result is a messy ethical and legal tangle
The decline of brony culture might have been inevitable, fads tend to fade, but for some unlikely fans of My Little Pony, the novelty is simply maturing
I saw this crazy-yellow product, says chef Rob Gentile. And I looked at (my chefs) and said, âWhat the hell is this?â
Will it be a hot war with protest and acrimony, like Uber vs. taxis? Or is the outcome inevitably foretold, no matter what, as in Netflix vs. Blockbuster?