Vermont lawmakers seek to remove slavery from constitution

MONTPELIER, Vt. - Vermont has a proud history of being the first state to abolish adult slavery, in 1777. Now lawmakers want to make sure any reference to slavery is removed from the state constitution.

Colorado voters last year approved a similar constitutional amendment, and Utah lawmakers have taken up a comparable measure this year.

The Vermont Constitution says no person 21 or older should serve as a slave unless bound by their own consent or “by law for the payment of debts, damages, fines, costs, or the like.” Nearly 90 years later, the 13th amendment to the U.S. Constitution banned slavery in the U.S., “except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted.”

Sen. Richard McCormack, a Democrat, has said that the language in the Vermont Constitution is flawed, but he is opposed to removing it, saying that it was superseded by the 13th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

“Being the first North American polity to outlaw slavery is a point of pride for all Vermonters. Whatever flaws may be in the language, it is best understood in the context of 1777, at which time it was a major step forward,” he wrote in a recent newspaper editorial. “The prohibition of slavery was a good thing, deserving of preservation.”

Vermont Law School professor Peter Teachout, who has expertise in U.S. constitutional law and Vermont constitutional law and history, is not opposed to amending Article 1 of the Vermont Constitution but has reservations about removing the wording.

“I am opposed to amending it on grounds that the framers of the first Vermont constitution only wanted to prohibit adult slavery and not child slavery. That is not historically accurate,” he wrote in an email. The Vermont Supreme Court ruled in 1802 that the Vermont Constitution prohibits slavery, and any document purporting to be the bill of sale of a slave — adult of child — “ceased to operate” once it entered Vermont, he wrote.

A Senate committee is now considering the amendment and is changing some of the language.

Article 1 of Vermont’s constitution “was a major step forward in human freedom,” said Civil War historian Howard Coffin, who said he has no objection to changing the constitution. But he advises having some mention of slavery being banned in Vermont to preserve Vermont’s history and protect people now and in the future.

“There’s slavery in the world today, he said. ”And you never know where the future’s going to leave us.“
Read more on Toronto Star
News Topics :
Similar Articles :
The state Senate in Vermont — the first state to abolish adult slavery — has given preliminary approval to a proposal to amend the state constitution to remove references to...
Top Stories
Lee McNeils great grandmother was brought to the United States as a child aboard a slave ship that traveled from Africa to Virginia. Later, Easter Noble Hampton walked across several states...
A close up of an 1876 copy of the Colorado Constitution, which contains an exception under which slavery could be used as punishment for a crime. Listen Colorado voters are heading...
Top Stories
NEW YORK — Whatever success Republicans have amassed in taking control of all three branches of U.S. government, and whatever fate awaits them as midterm elections near, some on the...
CAIRO, Egypt The panel amending Egypt s suspended constitution began voting Saturday on some 250 changes, the first step toward democratic rule following the July military coup that ousted...