News

HSBC fights back in £450m pension row

HSBC fights back in £450m pension row
Business
HSBC faces a shareholder vote at next month s annual meeting over an old pension fund for thousands of UK staff which campaigners argue is "unfair".

The long-running dispute relates to "clawback" applied to the pension payout when a member reaches retirement age and also receives a state pension.

Britain s biggest bank said it would cost £450m to stop the practice for members yet to retire.

It is urging its shareholders not to vote for the resolution on 12 April.

The detail of the shareholder vote is set out in the notice which is to be held in Birmingham, where it has opened a new headquarters for its UK bank.

Requisitioned by the Midland Clawback Campaign Shareholder Group, the resolution calls for the bank to "abolish, or effectively remedy, the unfair discriminatory practice" - also known as "state deduction" - from the pensions paid to members of the now closed 1974 Midland Bank defined benefit pension scheme.

HSBC took over Midland in the 1990s and the scheme has 52,000 members who would have been eligible to join between 31 December 1974 and 1 July 1996. Until June 2009, it was a final salary, non-contributory scheme.

The clawback "penalises the lowest paid, creating financial hardship" and creates "indirect discrimination" as the majority of lower-paid staff are women, the campaign group says.

Mark Tucker, the bank s chairman, tells shareholders not to back the resolution.

The bank said the scheme is not "unfair, disproportionate or discriminatory" and argues that describing it as "clawback" is not justified as the sums are not withheld or clawed-back.

The bank said it applies a "downward adjustment" when members hit state pension age, so that the pension sum received is "broadly maintained". It is legal and HSBC said that a statement by the pensions minister in November 2017 showed that the government does not support withdrawal of the practice.

HSBC said if it made changes for future pension payments it would cost £450m and that if did so on a retrospective basis it would cost "considerably more".

Frank Field, Labour MP, has previously said it could cost of in the region of £400m to £500m.
Read more on bbc.com
News Topics :
Similar Articles :
Business
Sharon McGeough Adams faces losing £200 a month from her HSBC pension and will protest at the bank s annual general meeting on Friday to demand changes. Having worked for the...
Business
Antonio Horta Osorio was the only employee entitled to such a pension, having overseen the ending of final salary schemes in 2014. Staff had criticised his arrangement, and there was talk...
Business
Women born in the 1950s claim the rise is unfair because they were not given enough time to make adjustments to cope with years without a state pension. They argued...
Business
Women born in the 1950s claim the rise is unfair because they were not given enough time to make adjustments to cope with years without a state pension. They are...
Business
On New Year s Day 1909, more than half a million people aged 70 and more, who had worked all their lives, had passed a means test and were of...