News

Senators call Google ‘monopoly upon monopoly’ as DOJ case nears

Senators call Google ‘monopoly upon monopoly’ as DOJ case nears
Business
U.S. senators laid out a case for why Google is abusing the size of its online empire to , articulating arguments that could be central to the government’s upcoming antitrust case against the tech giant.

The Alphabet Inc. unit has clear dominance in the search, online video and advertising technology markets, and uses those positions to benefit the rest of its business, several senators from both sides of the aisle argued during a Tuesday hearing organized by a subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary panel.

“You control YouTube and search, which are the dominant platforms; you control massive amounts of consumer data that you have harvested from your other consumer-facing platforms — Gmail, Google Maps, G Suite, etc.,” said Sen. Josh Hawley, a Republican from Missouri. “You then use those advantages in the ad stack at every single layer, every layer of which you exercise dominance in. This looks like monopoly upon monopoly in a classic case of tying.”

The Justice Department and state attorneys general have been asking increasingly detailed questions about how Google uses discounts, restrictions and bundling to encourage advertisers and publishers to use only its products instead of mixing and matching with competing services, Bloomberg has reported.

Google critics have said the fact that the company runs software to handle every step of the online advertising process gives it the chance to play both sides of this market and unfairly benefit its own products. The senators picked up on that argument during Tuesday’s hearing.

“In no other market does the party represent the seller, the buyer, makes the rules and conduct the auction,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat from Connecticut. He called Google’s position “indefensible.”

Don Harrison, Google’s president of global partnerships and corporate development, pushed back, saying the company doesn’t actually have dominance in the markets it operates in. Google may lead when it comes to all types of general searches, but for product queries and other commercial searches, consumers are more likely to start on Amazon.com Inc., Harrison said.

In advertising technology, many other successful companies exist in the space, which shows that Google isn’t hurting competition, he said.
Read more on Toronto Star
News Topics :
Similar Articles :
Business
Google’s search engine, one of the most profitable businesses in history, is about to face its biggest challenge as the U.S. government readies an antitrust lawsuit accusing the company of crushing...
Business
Internet search giant Google Inc. could be vulnerable to an antitrust case in the United States due to its dominant grip on the digital advertising market, says a Yale professor...
Business
Government officials building an antitrust case against Google are investigating whether the company engages in tying, the practice of bundling different products together in a way that can block out...
Technology
Another antitrust fine for Google. India’s competition commission has issued a 1.36BN rupees $21.1M penalty on the search giant for abusing its dominant position in the local search market for...
Politics
Google Advertising , Google Canada , Canada Probes Google , Competition Bureau Google , Google Advertising Competition , Google Anti Trust Probe , Google Antitrust Probe , Google Competition Bureau...