‘Trump political base hit hardest by coronavirus
|bbc.com 29 Jun 2020 at 19:15|
The economic impact of the coronavirus has taken a heavier toll on low-wage earners according to Tomas J Philipson, the chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers.
In an exclusive with the BBC before his reported departure , he said: "There s a sort of unique impact of this shock in that its very regressive, hitting the low wage part of the economy. Low-wage workers take a bigger hit than higher wage".
The virus has derailed any progress the US was making in raising the living standards of those on low pay, Prof Philipson said in an interview for Coronavirus: The Economic Shock , in which some of the world s leading economists and business leaders look at how the gravest economic downturn in nearly a hundred years may change the way we live and work.
"We had enormous success in growing lower wages before the pandemic struck, so this has taken a very regressive toll on the economy," he argues.
This has political implications for the upcoming November election as President Trump enjoys far higher support among non-college educated voters - often used as a proxy for low vs high wage earners - than among those who have college degrees.
Image caption President Trump enjoys high support among non-college educated voters
Prof Philipson also plays down the chances of a rapid economic recovery. "I m not saying we are going to have a v-shaped recovery, in fact the data shows a sort of gradual response."
However, he also defends the United States response to the pandemic and places some of the responsibility Covid-19 in the US at the doors of state governors.
"We were the first country to introduce travel bans from China and were criticised for that. Many state governments run by Democratic governors did not act before the federal government, even though they were free to do so."
He disagrees that a rise in US economic nationalism has been harmful to the world economy. "I think China was justifiably demonised in the sense that we treated them a lot better selling stuff here than they treated us selling stuff there. I think the president has done a lot to balance that".
Image caption Prof Niall Ferguson says the US and China are now in a cold war
Niall Ferguson, professor of history at Stanford University says the virus has seen economic tensions between the world s two biggest economies become more than a trade dispute. "It seems to me pretty clear that we re now in Cold War Two .
"It s going to be different from Cold War One , not least because the US and the Soviet Union were never as economically interdependent as the US and China have become over the last 20 years.
"It s hard to think of a better illustration of the downsides of globalisation than the extreme vulnerability it exposed to a virus that originated in in China."This has, he believes, huge economic implications for the entire interconnectedness of the world economy and therefore the size and the health of the global economy.
Image caption Ursula Burns: Business is an ally in the fight against inequality
Globalisation has been credited with lifting hundreds of millions of people out of poverty but has also been blamed for deepening inequality within countries. The virus has operated like an X-ray on the global economic body and its revealed weaknesses and imbalances along economic, gender and ethnic fault lines.
Ursula Burns was the first African American woman to sit on the board of a Fortune 500 company and she now sits on the boards of Nestle, Uber and ExxonMobil. She says business is emerging as an unlikely and welcome ally in the fight against inequality that she says the pandemic has laid bare.
"Amazingly enough, business is starting to be at the centre of that conversation. At the centre because governments around the world are not articulate enough or sensitive enough or informed enough to contribute positively to this conversation. So out of nowhere, businesses start to change the discourse in the world."
Will business step up? Or will the fight for survival mean savage cost-cutting and mass redundancies compounding the problems of inequality?
The in the second three months of this year. The ILO says 1.6 billion workers in the informal economy -nearly half of the global workforce - are in immediate danger of losing their livelihoods.
Image caption Tony Elumelu: Many in Africa face a stark choice, of risking dying of hunger or from Covid-19
In developing countries, where government safety nets are weak and where economies are particularly vulnerable, things may be particularly tough.
It is a point made by Tony Elumelu, who is one of Africa s most influential businessmen. He is a billionaire banker and founder of the Tony Elumelu Foundation, which invests in start-ups and SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises) across the continent.
"We have endemic poverty in Africa. Over 80% of our population live from hand to mouth. They go out, they die of Covid. They sit at home, they die of hunger. Then what is better for them to do? It is a bad situation but it gives us all the opportunity to re-set."
Big business - global corporations - seem ready to reset too. The chairman of Tata Group, Natarajan Chandrasekaran, and Nissan s chief operating officer, Ashwani Gupta, both believe global business is in the midst of a long-term rethink on how employers organise their workforce and how supply chains and resources will operate. They suggest sustainability may become more of a focus.
Image caption Natarajan Chandrasekaran: Global business is rethinking how it operates
In a remarkable broadcasting moment, Mr Chandrasekaran - a titan of global business - looked out across Mumbai and reflected on the change. "You can hear the birds. We can breathe fresh air… on a clear day we can see the stars."
So will the world grasp this opportunity to change how the world economy works and address pressing challenges that include global inequality and climate change?
Or when the health crises passes will things return to way they were? Will we miss an opportunity to change how the global economy functions for the welfare of us all?