New rules for Arctic shipping a missed opportunity

New rules for Arctic shipping  a missed opportunity
Heavy fuel oil (HFO) is widely used to power commercial ships. HFO s have been banned in Antarctic waters since 2011 over fears that oil spills could cause pollution.

Dr Sian Prior, from the Clean Arctic Alliance, said the IMO and its member states "must take collective responsibility for failing to put in place true protection of the Arctic, indigenous communities and wildlife from the threat of heavy fuel oil".

The IMO s plan "would allow 74% of HFO-fuelled ships to keep using HFO in the Arctic," said Dr Bryan Comer, from the International Council for Clean Transportation.

"(It) would result in a reduction of HFO carried of just 30% and a cut in black carbon emissions of only 5%," he added.

And John Maggs, senior policy advisor at Seas at Risk said: "A ban that affects just a quarter of ships is not a ban at all."

A coalition of green groups had proposed a much tougher set of restrictions but they were rejected by delegates.

image captionArctic sea ice is disappearing

HFO produces emissions of harmful pollutants, including sulphur oxide, nitrogen oxides, and black carbon. Furthermore, an accident which resulted in an HFO spill from a ship could wreak havoc on the Arctic s fragile ecosystem.

Analysts say with the amount of sea ice reducing in the Arctic, more and more ships will use the Northern Sea Route.

The new restrictions, which will come into force in July 2024, aim to reduce the number of ships that can use and transport HFO in the Arctic.

But included are a whole string of exclusions and waivers for ships that carry the flag of the five central Arctic coastal countries (Russia, Norway, Denmark (Greenland), Canada and the US) until July 2029.

Russia has the largest number of vessels in the Arctic area. It told IMO delegates that the NGO proposal was "irresponsible".

Earlier this month, Norway announced its own proposed HFO ban from all the waters around the Arctic island archipelago of Svalbard.

"This is yet another sad day for the Arctic," said Sigurd Enge, manager of Shipping, Marine and Arctic Issues, Bellona.

"The Arctic environment is threatened from all sides, from climate change, toxic contamination, plastic pollution, oil exploration and other extractive industries. What the Arctic needs now is better protection and bold politicians."
News Topics :
Similar Articles :
But environmental groups say the International Maritime Organization’s proposal is so full of loopholes that heavy fuel oil will go on being burned for another decade. “That’s an extreme timeline...
The push to eliminate the use of heavy fuel oil HFO by ships in the Arctic took a small step forward last week in London when the shipping industry s...
The federal government is expected to support international measures that would reduce the environmental impact of Arctic shipping but would cost northern families hundreds of dollars a year. On Monday,...
The federal government has announced it will support an international ban on environmentally damaging heavy fuel oils in Arctic shipping. The backing, released during meetings on the issue in London,...
We believe that measures are desperately needed to reduce the environmental impacts from Arctic shipping, and that a logical place to focus attention is vessel fuel quality, said the letter...