News

Saliva could hold clues to how sick you will get from COVID-19

Saliva could hold clues to how sick you will get from COVID-19
Science
To the known risk factors for developing severe COVID-19age, male sex, or any of a series of underlying conditionsa new study adds one more: high levels of the virus in your saliva. Standard COVID-19 tests sample the nasal passage. But several new tests look for SARS-CoV-2, the pandemic coronavirus, in saliva, and the new work finds a striking correlation between high virus levels there and later hospitalization or death. If the results are confirmed, saliva tests could help doctors prioritize which patients in the early stages of the disease should receive medicines that drive down levels of the virus.

I thought it was pretty striking, says Shane Crotty, a virologist at the La Jolla Institute for Immunology, who was not involved with the research. Crotty notes the results suggest virus levels in saliva reflect viral load deep in the lungs, where the disease does much of its damage in severe cases. That is a fundamentally valuable insight, Crotty says.

The new work isnt the first to link the bodys coronavirus load and disease outcome. Several research groups have found a correlation between high viral levels in the nasal passages at the time of a patients hospital admission and ultimate disease severity. But other groups have failed to find that same link.

The standard test to detect SARS-CoV-2 samples nasal mucus using nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs. The procedure is unpleasant, but it is the customary way to sample respiratory pathogens. In recent months, however, several research groups have developed and received emergency use authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for tests detecting SARS-CoV-2 in saliva.

Yale University researchers were among the first , and the universitys hospitals have been using both saliva and NP swab tests. In both cases, labs analyze the samples using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction tests, which can detect genetic material from SARS-CoV-2 and quantify the number of viral particles in each milliliter of sample.

Researchers led by Akiko Iwasaki, an immunologist at Yale, compared viral loads in saliva and NP swabs from 154 patients and 109 people without the virus. They divided the patients into groups that had low, medium, and high viral loads as determined by both types of test. Then they compared those results with the severity of symptoms the patients developed later.

They found that patients who developed severe disease, were hospitalized, or died were more likely to have had high virus loads in their saliva tests, but not in their NP swabs. Viral load in both saliva and nasal mucus declined over time in patients who recovered, but not in those who died.

Iwasaki and her colleagues argue that saliva may be a better predictor of disease outcome than nasal mucus because the latter comes from the upper respiratory tract, whereas severe disease is associated with damage deep in the lungs. Saliva may better represent what is going on in the lower respiratory tract, Iwasaki says, because cilia lining the respiratory tract naturally move mucus up from the lungs into the throat, where it mixes with saliva; coughs have the same effect.

The results dont have enough statistical power to reveal how much more likely a person with a high saliva viral load is to develop severe COVID-19, Iwasaki says. She is also eager for other groups to replicate the results, especially because efforts to link high NP swab viral loads with disease progression have had mixed results.

If other research confirms the finding, it would clear away a lot of the fog around this disease, Crotty says. Monica Gandhi, an infectious disease expert at the University of California, San Francisco, adds that if saliva tests are predictive, they could help doctors identify patients to treat early with either antibodies to reduce viral load or steroids to tamp down overactive nonspecific immune responses.

Saliva tests are cheaper and easier than NP tests, but much less widely available. So confirmation of the new results could bolster efforts to make saliva tests more readily available, says Sri Kosuri, CEO of Octant, Inc., a biotech company. If this study happened in March, wed be talking about whether we should be doing NP testing at all, Kosuri says.
Read more on sciencemag.org
News Topics :
RELATED STORIES :
Science
Early and accurate detection is critical for preventing the spread of COVID 19 and providing appropriate care for patients. Nasopharyngeal NP swabs, which require inserting a long shaft into the nasal...
Science
Anyone who has undergone a nasal swab or saliva test for COVID 19 knows that the virus is most easily detected in the nose and mouth. That s why, University at...
Science
To properly monitor and help curb the spread of COVID 19, several millions of diagnostic tests are required daily in just the United States alone. There is still a widespread lack...
Science
There is wide variation in the performance of commercial kits for detecting antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 SARS CoV 2 , according to a study published September 24 in the...
Science
Self collected saliva and deep nasal swabs collected by healthcare providers are equally effective for detecting SARS CoV 2, the virus that causes COVID 19, according to a new study conducted by ARUP Laboratories...